USPTO serial 78908342
INKSLINGERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INKSLINGERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James G. Coplit
Susan M. Schlesinger GRIMES & BATTERSBY, LLP488 MAIN AVENUESUITE 3NORWALK, CT 06851-1008Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | All-purpose athletic bags; all-purpose sports bags; attaché cases; backpacks; beach bags; beach umbrellas; belt pouches; billfolds; book bags; briefcases; business cases; business card cases; camping bags for use as luggage; canes; carry-on bags; coin purses; cosmetic cases sold empty; duffel bags; fanny packs; garment bags for travels; gym bags; handbags; key cases; knapsacks; leather key chains; luggage; luggage tags; men's clutches; purses; saddle bags; satchels; school bags; textile shopping bags; shoulder bags; sports bags; suitcases; toiletry bags sold empty; tool bags sold empty; tote bags; travel bags; trunks; umbrellas; waist packs; and wallets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |