USPTO serial 78908726
TWI INSTITUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 4, 2007
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TWI INSTITUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Central New York Technology Development Organization (TDO)
Syracuse, NY
Other trademarks owned by Central New York Technology Development Organization (TDO)
Central New York Technology Development Organization (TDO)
Liverpool, NY
Other trademarks owned by Central New York Technology Development Organization (TDO)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Muldoon
James R. Muldoon HARRIS BEACH PLLCSUITE 200333 WEST WASHINGTON STREETSYRACUSE, NY 13202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Education services, namely, conducting educational seminars for attendance by job supervisors for improving instruction skills of supervisors, job method definition skills of supervisors, and leadership skills of supervisors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 2, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Central New York Technology Development Organization (TDO)
- Other trademarks owned by Central New York Technology Development Organization (TDO)
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named TWI INSTITUTE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Mar 31, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | โ |
| Mar 31, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 31, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Mar 27, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | โ |
| Dec 14, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Aug 16, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Sep 4, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jul 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jul 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Jun 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jun 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| May 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |