USPTO serial 78908741
DANDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOONE, JOHN C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DANDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PANAMA CITY, PA
PANAMA CITY, PA
Stockholm, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Rosenbloum, Esq. and Kristen L. Fancher, Esq.
Robert A. Rosenbloum, Esq. and Kristen L. Fancher, GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP3290 NORTHSIDE PARKWAY, Suite 400ATLANTA, GA 30327UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, live musical and vocal performances by a solo recording artist and musical group; providing a web site featuring pre-recorded musical audio and audiovisual clips, photographs, news, reviews and other multimedia articles in connection with a solo recording artist and musical group; fan club services; production of television programs; online magazines in the fields of music and entertainment; entertainment services in the nature of ongoing television programs in the field of music; television production, theatrical production and motion picture film production | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 25, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 16, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |