USPTO serial 78909537
AIRS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pierre C. Van Rysselberghe
PIERRE C VAN RYSSELBERGHE KOLISCH HARTWELL PC520 SW YAMHILL ST STE 200PORTLAND, OR 97204-1378UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal containers for transporting goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Equipment for moving or transporting water, supplies, and debris, namely, lifting installations for transporting persons and goods; motors for rescue baskets; motorized equipment for wire reel cable laying, hydraulic grapples | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Equipment for use on helicopters, namely, firefighting and rescue equipment, namely, rescue baskets for carrying people, water and foam cannons | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Aircraft, namely, helicopters | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Emergency incident response services, namely, rescue services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Erickson Air-Crane Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Erickson Air-Crane Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named AIRS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 5, 2008 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |