USPTO serial 78909726
OCULUSGEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OCULUSGEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fei-Fei Chao
Fei-Fei Chao Andrews Kurth, LLP1350 I Street NWSuite 1100Washington, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatus and instruments, namely, ophthalmological instruments, namely, manual ophthalmic surgical instruments; ophthalmometers, galvanic therapeutic appliances, artificial eyes, artificial skin for surgical purposes, intraocular prostheses, lenses for surgical implantation, surgical implants made of artificial materials, intraocular prostheses lenses for surgical implantation; testing apparatus for medical purposes, namely, intraocular pressure measuring devices, corneal radius measuring devices | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 26, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 26, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |