USPTO serial 78909731
BANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Gast (a member of the Bar of the State of Florida)
DAVID A GAST (A MEMBER OF THE BAR OF TH MALLOY & MALLOY PA2800 SW 3RD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129-2317UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal key chains | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 009 | Prerecorded CDs featuring music | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 014 | Jewelry; key chains of precious metal | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 016 | Paper baby bibs | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
| 025 | aprons, ascots, baby bibs not of paper, baby bunting, bandanas, bathing caps, bathing suits, bathrobes, beach cover-ups, beachwear, beanies, belts, bib overalls, bikinis, blazers, bloomers, blouses, body suits, bonnets, boots, bow ties, bras, brassieres, briefs, bustiers, camisoles, capris, caps, cardigans, chaps, cloaks, coats, collars, corselets, coveralls, diapers, dresses, dungarees, flip flops, footwear, garters, gloves, gowns, hats, head wear, hosiery, jackets, jeans, jumpsuits, lab coats, leotards, lingerie, loungewear, miniskirts, mittens, money belts, mufflers, neckties, nightwear, overalls, overcoats, pajamas, panties, pants, pantsuits, pantyhose, petticoats, polo shirts, ponchos, pullovers, raincoats, rainwear, robes, rompers, sandals, saris, sarongs, sashes, scarves, shirts, shoes, shorts, shoulder wraps (clothing), shower caps, silk scarves, ski wear, skirts, skorts, slacks, sleepwear, slippers, slips, smocks, sneakers, socks, stockings, suit coats, suits, sun visors, sunsuits, suspenders, sweat pants, sweat shirts, sweat shorts, sweat suits, sweatbands, sweaters, sweatsocks, swim wear, swimsuits, tank-tops, teddies, thongs, ties clothing, tights, topcoats, trench coats, trousers, trunks, T-shirts, tuxedos, under garments, underpants, undershirts, underskirts, underwear, uniforms, veils, vests, visors, waist belts, wrap-arounds, wraps clothing, wristbands | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | water for drinking | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Haddad Productions, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named BANG
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |