USPTO serial 78910000
FRIDA KAHLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 2010
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with FRIDA KAHLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mexico, D.F., MX
PANAMA CITY, PA
PANAMA CITY, PA
PANAMA CITY, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William R. Trueba, Jr.
William R. Trueba, Jr. Trueba & Suarez, PLLC9150 S. Dadeland Blvd.Suite 1008Miami, FL 33156Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers [ mineral and aerated waters; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, aerated fruit juices, apple juice beverages, coconut milk, coconut water, coffee-flavored soft drink, energy drinks, flavored waters, frozen fruit beverages, frozen fruit-based beverages, fruit beverages, fruit drinks, fruit flavored soft drinks, fruit juice concentrates, fruit juices, fruit nectars, fruit punch, fruit-flavored beverages, fruit-flavored drinks, grape juice beverages, herbal juices, iced fruit beverages, isotonic drinks, lemonade, nonalcoholic aperitifs, non-alcoholic beverages, namely, carbonated beverages, non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices, non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor, non-alcoholic cocktail mixes, non-alcoholic fruit beverages, non-carbonated, non-alcoholic frozen flavored beverages, orange juice beverages, pineapple juice beverages, soft drinks, sports drinks, tomato juice, tomato juice beverages, vegetable juices; drinks made of fruit and fruit juices; syrups to make drinks, namely, syrup for making lemonade, syrups for beverages, syrups for making beverages, syrups for making soft drinks, syrups for making fruit drinks, syrups for making whey-based beverages; preparations for making soft drinks, preparations for making fruit drinks, preparations for making whey-based beverages ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Isolda Pinedo Kahlo
- Other trademarks owned by FRIDA KAHLO CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FRIDA KAHLO CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FRIDA KAHLO CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named FRIDA KAHLO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 14, 2026 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 5, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 25, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 21, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 29, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 29, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2015 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |