USPTO serial 78910059
GMX ULTRA-SHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BURNS, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GMX ULTRA-SHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cleveland, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian E. Turung
BRIAN E TURUNG FAY SHARPE FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE LLP1100 SUPERIOR AVE E FL 7CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2531UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Waterproofing materials, namely, non-metallic polymer coatings for side walls, flooring, and/or roofing | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Mar 31, 2005 |
| 002 | Waterproofing materials, namely, non-metallic solvent-based or water-based coatings used for waterproofing side walls, flooring, and/or roofing; waterproofing materials, namely, coatings in the nature of non-metallic masonry sealers for side walls, flooring, and/or roofing; waterproofing materials, namely, non-metallic concrete paints for side walls, flooring, and/or roofing; Waterproofing materials, namely, non-metallic polymer coatings for side walls, flooring, and/or roofing | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Mar 31, 2005 |
| 019 | Non-metallic polymer membrane for side walls, flooring, and/or roofing; non-metal construction materials, namely, foundation drain and pipe systems consisting of sheet drains, strip drains, strip drain outlets, corner fittings, corner guards, tee connectors, drain splices, drain pipes; construction materials, namely, nonmetal foundation drainage boards and nonmetal foundation protection boards; Non-woven fiber glass board for side walls, flooring, and/or roofing | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1989 |
| 024 | POLYESTER REINFORCEMENT FABRIC FOR SIDE WALLS, FLOORING, AND/OR ROOFING | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Mar 31, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GMX, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named GMX ULTRA-SHIELD
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |