USPTO serial 78910295
EAT RIGHT AMERICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EAT RIGHT AMERICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tristram R. Fall, III, Esquire
Tristram R. Fall, Esquire Fox Rothschild LLP2000 Market StreetTenth FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software in the field of diet and nutrition that creates an algorithm to assign a score to food products sold in commerce; computer programs used for electronic cash register systems in grocery sales; computer programs, namely, applications creating an algorithm to assign a nutritional score to all food products sold and providing to purchasers the score for individual products, the average score of the products purchased, and/or the total score of products purchased | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nutri-Meals, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Nutri-Meals, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Nutritional Excellence, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EAT RIGHT AMERICA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 30, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 11, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2008 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |