Drawing for CYCLES GLADIATOR

USPTO serial 78910557

CYCLES GLADIATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYCLES GLADIATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew A. Powelson

MATTHEW A POWELSON LARIVIERE, GRUBMAN & PAYNE LLP19 UPPER RAGSDALE DR STE 200MONTEREY, CA 93940-7808UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Cycling clothing, namely, jackets, vests, hats, shirts, shorts, socks, shoes, and rainwear, pants, gloves, leggings, and bicycle jerseysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 27, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 27, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 12, 2009EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 21, 2009GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2009GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 21, 2009CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 24, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 20, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 20, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 2, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 1, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 1, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 1, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 1, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 29, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 25, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 22, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance