USPTO serial 78910868
ROYAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROYAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Filippo Cinotti
FILIPPO CINOTTI CINOTTI & BUCK11 BROADWAY STREETROOM 368NEW YORK, NY 10004-2967Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Automatic cash registers; Cash dispensers; Cash registers; Computer programs used for electronic cash register systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Electrical and electronic typewriters; Electronic typewriters; Storage albums for typewriter printwheels and typeballs; Typewriter printwheels; Typewriter ribbons; Typewriter typeballs; Typewriter typing elements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Consumer Information Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Royal Consumer Information Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named ROYAL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 3, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |