USPTO serial 78911870
PETER PAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PETER PAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steve W. Ackerman
Steve W. Ackerman The Walt Disney Company500 South Buena Vista StreetBURBANK, CA 91521-0639UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Production, presentation, distribution, and rental of motion picture films; production, presentation, distribution, and rental of television and radio programs; production, presentation, and rental of sound and video recordings; production of entertainment shows and interactive programs in the field of children's entertainment for distribution via television, cable, satellite, audio and video media, cartridges, laser discs, computer discs and electronic means; production and provision of news commentary on-line via a global computer network; amusement park and theme park services; educational services in the field of entertainment relating to theme parks; entertainment services rendered in theme parks in the nature of live shows, live musical performances, amusement park shows, and appearances by professional entertainers and celebrities; presentation of live stage shows; presentation of live show performances; entertainment in the nature of theater productions; entertainer services in the nature of live, televised and movie appearances by a professional entertainer, and live performances by costumed characters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 14, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |