Drawing for FIGURE 8 FILMS

USPTO serial 78912711

FIGURE 8 FILMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIGURE 8 FILMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald K. Losch

RONALD K. LOSCH LOSCH & EHRLICH425 CALIFORNIA STREETSUITE 2025SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video disks featuring youth street activitiesACTIVEApr 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 22, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 22, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 22, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 22, 2009ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 20, 2009LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
May 20, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 21, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 17, 2007IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 16, 2007AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 28, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 28, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 28, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 22, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance