Drawing for KERNEL CARD

USPTO serial 78912732

KERNEL CARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KERNEL CARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert A. Seldon

Robert A. Seldon SELDON & SCILLIERI18TH FLOOR10940 WILSHIRE BLVD.LOS ANGELES, CA 90024-3952

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Plastic cards with magnetic coding and made from a composition having little or no petroleum product for use as credit cards, financial transaction cards, library cards, hotel room keycards, casino cards, and plastic gift cardsACTIVE—
020Plastic cards without magnetic coding made from a composition having little or no petroleum product for making credit cards, financial transaction cards, library cards, hotel room keycards, casino cards and plastic gift cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 2, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 2, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 27, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 27, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 27, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 9, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 24, 2006GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Nov 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance