USPTO serial 78912796
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
Aliso Viejo, CA
Other trademarks owned by Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
Aliso Viejo, CA
Other trademarks owned by Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
Miami, FL
Other trademarks owned by Lennar Pacific Properties Management, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colbie Brazell
Colbie Brazell Slates Harwell, LLP1700 Pacific AvenueSuite 3800DALLAS, TX 75201| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate listing services; real estate management, namely, brokerage and rental of mid and high-rise condominium properties for residential, business, and retail use; and | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 2, 2005 |
| 037 | Real estate development of mid and high-rise buildings for both residential, business, and retail use, namely, construction consulting in the nature of site selection and construction planning; construction management and supervision; and construction services, namely, planning, laying out and custom construction of mid and high-rise properties; building and property maintenance | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 2, 2005 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 20, 2015 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2014 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 4, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |