Drawing for DUB

USPTO serial 78913466

DUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Katherine L. McDaniel

KATHERINE L MCDANIEL BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104-3300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018all-purpose sport bags; all-purpose athletic bags; all-purpose carrying bags; athletic bags; backpacks; book bags; luggage; wallets; suitcases; handbags; parasols; and umbrellasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 25, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 24, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 15, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 15, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 10, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 10, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 23, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance