USPTO serial 78913609
VORTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3334993Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2007
- Examiner
- WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VORTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Prescott, AZ
Prescott, AZ
Prescott, AZ
PRESCOTT, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
C. Robert von Hellens
C ROBERT VON HELLENS CAHILL, VON HELLENS & GLAZER PLC155 PARK ONE, 2141 E HIGHLAND AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Ozone generators, water treatment equipment, namely, ozone and ultraviolet sterilizers for residential and commercial usage and air purifiers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VORTEX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by VORTEX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by VORTEX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by VORTEX PURE WATER, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named VORTEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |