USPTO serial 78914683
THE PAVILLION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE PAVILLION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Midrand, Gauteng, ZA
Midrand, Gauteng, ZA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 26, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 26, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2010 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |