Drawing for THE BLUE BOOK OF NEW YORK CITY JUDGES

USPTO serial 78914773

THE BLUE BOOK OF NEW YORK CITY JUDGES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3529537Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 4, 2008
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE BLUE BOOK OF NEW YORK CITY JUDGES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Meyer A. Gross

MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE FL 19NEW YORK, NY 10017-6313UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016BOOKS AND PRINTED PERIODICALS ABOUT NEW YORK CITY JUDGESSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 1, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2015C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)โ€”
Nov 4, 2008R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Sep 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Sep 29, 2008CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERโ€”
Sep 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTEREDโ€”
Sep 5, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Sep 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ€” typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2008IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTEDโ€”
Feb 19, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Feb 19, 2008AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETEโ€”
Feb 19, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILEDโ€”
Feb 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Feb 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Aug 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Aug 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Aug 16, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jul 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Jun 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jun 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Jun 1, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Nov 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Jun 28, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance