Drawing for WHOOZ BLOOZ

USPTO serial 78915364

WHOOZ BLOOZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHOOZ BLOOZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard F Mandelbaum

HOWARD F MANDELBAUM LEVINE & MANDELBAUM444 MADISON AVE FL 35NEW YORK, NY 10022-6903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025jeans, pants, jackets, shorts and skirtsACTIVEJul 10, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 28, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 27, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 11, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 11, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 11, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 16, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 20, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 20, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 25, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 25, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 1, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance