Drawing for 666

USPTO serial 78915506

666

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 666?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert W. Sacoff

ROBERT W SACOFF PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software; player-operated electronic controllers for electronic video game machines, video game machines for use with external display screen or monitor, and replacement parts therefore; downloadable computer game software; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of magazines and reviews in the field of computer games; downloadable publications in the nature of magazines relating to gamesACTIVE—
028Hand-held units for playing video games; arcade-type electronic video gamesACTIVE—
041Online entertainment, namely, games, music, news and information relating to games; providing on-line computer games and on-line interactive video games, and consultation relating thereto; providing websites relating to game playingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 18, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 3, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 18, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 28, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance