USPTO serial 78915679
MONSTER BATTLE ROAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3654794Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 14, 2009
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MONSTER BATTLE ROAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tokyo, JP
Tokyo, JP
KABUSHIKI KAISHA SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS (ALSO TRADING AS SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS CO., LTD.)
TOKYO, JP
KABUSHIKI KAISHA SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS (ALSO TRADING AS SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS CO., LTD.)
TOKYO, JP
KABUSHIKI KAISHA SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS (ALSO TRADING AS SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS CO., LTD.)
TOKYO, JP
KABUSHIKI KAISHA SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS (ALSO TRADING AS SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS CO., LTD.)
TOKYO, JP
Tokyo, JP
Tokyo, JP
TOKYO, JP
TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
Mark I. Peroff Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPSeven Times Square - 22nd FloorNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer game software; video game software; game cards, namely, printed cards with bar codes for use with arcade video game machines with built-in screens for additional game features | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Computer game strategy guidebooks; video game strategy guidebooks, collectors' card albums; trading card albums; printed matter, namely, collectors' cards; trading cards; plastic pages for holding trading cards and collectors' cards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Arcade games; arcade video game machines; stand alone video game machines; amusement game machines; playing cards; card games; handheld video game units; game card holders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games and/or online video games | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA SQUARE ENIX
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA SQUARE ENIX
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS (ALSO TRADING AS SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS CO., LTD.)
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS (ALSO TRADING AS SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS CO., LTD.)
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS (ALSO TRADING AS SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS CO., LTD.)
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS (ALSO TRADING AS SQUARE ENIX HOLDINGS CO., LTD.)
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Square Enix
- Other trademarks owned by Kabushiki Kaisha Square Enix
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA SQUARE ENIX
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA SQUARE ENIX
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MONSTER BATTLE ROAD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 13, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 4, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 8, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |