Drawing for NETMAN

USPTO serial 78916052

NETMAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NETMAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean Collin

Sean Collin Pitts and Eckl, P.C.401 E Tuscaloosa StFlorence, AL 35630UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software and video game softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 2, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 27, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 27, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 2, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 2, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 2, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 2, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 3, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 3, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 29, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 18, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 18, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2007WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2007WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 7, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jun 29, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance