USPTO serial 78916297
TRAVEL CHOCOLATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRAVEL CHOCOLATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Middle Village, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chocolate; Chocolate bars; Chocolate candies; Chocolate chips; Chocolate covered nuts; Chocolate fondue; Chocolate food beverages not being dairy-based or vegetable based; Chocolate mousse; Chocolate pastes; Chocolate powder; Chocolate syrup; Chocolate topping; Chocolate truffles; Chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies; Chocolate-based ready-to-eat food bars; Filled chocolate; Grain-based food bars also containing chocolate; Hot chocolate; Milk chocolate; Spread containing chocolate and nuts | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |