USPTO serial 78917369
EYEBROW ENGINEER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3510322Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 30, 2008
- Examiner
- RAPPAPORT, SETH
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EYEBROW ENGINEER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J. KAY
CHRISTOPHER J. KAY LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER KAY3111 W DR M.L. KING JR BLVD STE 100TAMPA, FL 33607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetic preparations for eyebrows; Depilatories; Waxes for removal of body hair, namely, waxes for removal of eyebrows; Essential oils for eyebrows; Eyebrow styling gels; Make-up powder, namely, eyebrow powders; Eyebrow pencils; Hair dyes, namely, dyes for eyebrow hair | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 23, 2001 |
| 044 | Beauty salon services, namely, providing beauty care services for eyebrows; Beauty salon services, namely, analyzing, designing, shaping, and constructing eyebrows for others including constructing eyebrows for cancer and chemotherapy patients | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 23, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |