Drawing for CHILL CHASERS

USPTO serial 78917390

CHILL CHASERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHILL CHASERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia S. Smart

Patricia S. Smart Smart & Bostjancich30 West Monroe Street, Suite 800Chicago, IL 60603-2424UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Underwear, loungewear and sleepwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 1, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 15, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 12, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 27, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 27, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 4, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 4, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 4, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 31, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 31, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance