USPTO serial 78917535
NY SNACKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3226236Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2007
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NY SNACKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald J. Baron
RONALD J BARON HOFFMANN & BARON LLP6900 JERICHO TPKESYOSSET, NY 11791-4499UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Salty snacks, namely, potato chips, barbeque flavored potato chips, sea salt and vinegar flavored potato chips, potato sticks; banana chips; sweet and sour processed onion rings; preserved meats, namely, fried pork rinds, barbeque flavored pork rinds, fried pork skins, beef jerky, beef sausages in stick form, beef pepperoni and cheese sticks; pizza flavored potato sticks, pizza flavored potato chips, pizza flavored cheese, pizza flavored beef jerky; processed nuts, namely, cashews, peanuts, and pistachios; processed edible seeds, namely, sunflower seeds, party/bar mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 13, 2005 |
| 030 | Extruded snacks, namely, puffed cheese curls and crunchy nacho cheese curls; nacho cheese tortilla chips, baked blue corn tortilla chips, corn chips; pretzels; pizza flavored pretzels, crackers, namely, original, ranch, cheddar and white cheddar flavored crackers; cracker combinations, namely, cheese-filled and peanut butter filled sandwich crackers; party/bar mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, candied nuts and/or popped popcorn; popped popcorn; multigrain chips | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 13, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |