Drawing for ADNET INTERACTIVE

USPTO serial 78917563

ADNET INTERACTIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADNET INTERACTIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David O. Klein

David O. Klein Klein Zelman Rothermel LLP485 Madison Avenue15th FloorNew York, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising via electronic media and specifically the internet; Dissemination of advertising for others via the Internet; On-line advertising on computer communication networks; Promotion, advertising and marketing of on-line websitesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2009MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 26, 2009ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 26, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 8, 2009EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 23, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 23, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 25, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 25, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 18, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 10, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 24, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 4, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance