Drawing for CATALYST

USPTO serial 78917595

CATALYST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CATALYST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Camille M. Miller

Camille M. Miller COZEN O'CONNOR1900 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3527UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Educational software for tracking reading skillsACTIVE—
016children's books; skill cards featuring reading exercises; folders; printed curriculum materials for school administrators, teachers and adults to conduct a reading program and to teach reading to students from pre-kindergarten through secondary schoolACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely conducting a reading program for pre-kindergarten through secondary school students and a program for assessing the level of difficulty of books as part of a reading programACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 10, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 10, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 28, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 5, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 20, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 16, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance