USPTO serial 78917743
PROFOUND BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROFOUND BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randy Friedberg
RANDY FRIEDBERG OLSHAN GRUNDMAN FROME ROSENZWEIG & WOLOS65 E 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10022-3219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair care preparations, cosmetics, fragrances for personal use, and non-medicated skin care prepartions | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | salon business management software | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | hand-held electric blow dryers | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | hairbrushes and hair combs | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely conducting lectures, seminars and workshops in the fields of cosmetics and skin care, and distributing course materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Profound Beauty Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PROFOUND BEAUTY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |