USPTO serial 78917896
E-VAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENJAMIN, SARA NICOLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-VAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory J. Chinlund
Gregory J. Chinlund MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP6300 SEARS TOWER233 SOUTH WACKER DRIVECHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Leachate evaporators for wastewater and refinery caustic treatment; leachate evaporation systems and equipment composed of submerged gas evaporators for wastewater and refinery caustic treatment; vapor injection systems composed of draft tubes for dispersing gases within liquid undergoing treatment; residual solidification systems composed of positive displacement pumps for transferring settled sludge produced in the evaporators to downstream treatment and/or disposal; waste heat recovery blowers for transferring hot gases to draft tubes within the evaporators; electronic programmable logic control panels for controlling evaporation processes, demisters including gravity settling chambers, vane type demisters and mesh pads for removing entrained liquid from the exhaust gas of the evaporation process used in wastewater and caustic treatment; leachate and wastewater residual removal systems composed of pumps, piping, and controls | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Wastewater treatment services; refinery caustic treatment services, namely,environmental remediation services in the nature of wastewater and refinery caustic treatment; consulting services in the area of wastewater and refinery caustic treatment | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | System design services for design of wastewater and refinery treatment and caustic treatment plants and systems in the area of wastewater and refinery caustic treatment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Liquid Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Liquid Solutions, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named E-VAP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |