Drawing for SIMPANA

USPTO serial 78918181

SIMPANA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SIMPANA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tara L. Benson

TARA L BENSON GIORDANO, HALLERAN & CIESLAPO BOX 190MIDDLETOWN, NJ 07748-0190UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer programming for others, computer consultation; computer support services, namely, provision of technical assistance and technical support; computer software design for others; computer monitoring services which track software performance and processes and sends out historical reports and alerts, and providing back-up computer programs and facilities; integration of computer systems and networks; customization of computer hardware and software for end usersACTIVEJul 9, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 24, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2008CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2008ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2008SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 26, 2008CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Feb 5, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2008IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 4, 2008EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 28, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 5, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 6, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 6, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 5, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 23, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance