USPTO serial 78918216
WW THE WISDOM KEEPERS OF THE WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WW THE WISDOM KEEPERS OF THE WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Klosterneuburg, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen M. Harnik
STEPHEN M HARNIK LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN HARNIK405 LEXINGTON AVE42ND FLNEW YORK, NY 10174Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on CD, DVD and on-line featuring, personal awareness topics, environmental issues and business topics; magazine publishing; Publishing of books, reviews and other printed matter like magazines as well as related electronic data carriers; Publishing of electronic publications; Publishing of web magazines; Online journals, namely, blogs featuring , personal awareness topics, environmental issues and business topics; operation of video equipment or audio equipment or any other recording device for digital media for production of radio or television programs; production of video cassettes; Arranging of exhibitions, seminars and conferences; Conducting workshops and seminars in personal awareness and ancient traditions practiced around the world; Workshops and seminars in the field of personal awareness, environmental issues and business topics and distributing course materials therewith; Educational and entertainment services, namely, providing motivational and educational speakers; Entertainment in the nature of on-going television shows in the field of personal awareness topics, environmental issues and business topics; Entertainment, namely, the production of television shows; Entertainment services, namely, providing a radio program in the field of personal awareness, environmental issues and business topics via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing a television program in the field of personal awareness, environmental issues and business topics via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of movies, books and all other digital media content, namely, electronic and digital publications | ACTIVE | Nov 29, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | GEAN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 25, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |