Drawing for BIOACTIVITY

USPTO serial 78918764

BIOACTIVITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOACTIVITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ernest G. Bootsma

Ernest G. Bootsma Ater Wynne LLP1331 NW Lovejoy, Suite 900Portland, OR 97209UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and software used in identifying insectsACTIVE
042Biological research and analysis, namely, monitoring, identification and reporting of insects; and vermin surveillance and detection servicesACTIVE
044Extermination for agriculture in the nature of integrated pest management services featuring identification and reporting of insects and corresponding treatments or recommendations for treatment for infestations thereof in farms, forests, orchards, green houses, nurseries and other agricultural marketsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 29, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 29, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 29, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 29, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 29, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 18, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 7, 2008NEWNNEW NOA TO ISSUE
Oct 7, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Oct 6, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Oct 6, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 29, 2008IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Jan 29, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 23, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 3, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 1, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Oct 1, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 1, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 1, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 1, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 27, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Aug 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 26, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 26, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 26, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 26, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 5, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 17, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance