USPTO serial 78918838
EVENESCENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3960634Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 2011
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EVENESCENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Environ Skin Care (Proprietary) Limited
Western Cape, ZA
Other trademarks owned by Environ Skin Care (Proprietary) Limited
Environ Skin Care (Proprietary) Limited
Western Cape, ZA
Other trademarks owned by Environ Skin Care (Proprietary) Limited
Environ Skin Care (Proprietary) Limited
Western Cape, ZA
Other trademarks owned by Environ Skin Care (Proprietary) Limited
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Vogel
Jason M. Vogel Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP| 1114 Avenue of the AmericasNEW YORK, NY 10036-7703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, dentifrices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Environ Skin Care (Proprietary) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Environ Skin Care (Proprietary) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Environ Skin Care (Proprietary) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named EVENESCENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 17, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |