USPTO serial 78918983
INTELLIGENT WATERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLIGENT WATERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Rohlf, Esq.
Sherri L. Rohlf, Esq. SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER, DUFFY & FOSTER,100 WASHINGTON AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401-2110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care products namely, shampoos, conditioners, spray and sculpting gels, hair color, and waving lotions; skin care products, namely, soap, moisturizers, toners, skin cleaning creams, lotions and gels, body and facial lotions, masks and astringents; cosmetics, namely, lipstick, eye shadow, foundation, blush, face powder, concealer, eye pencils, lip pencils and mascara; personal hygiene products, namely, bath and body gels, fragrances for personal use, body oils and lotions, skin cremes, skin lotions, skin cleansing emollients, dual skin cleansing and moisturizing oils and lotions; perfumes and colognes; household cleaning products, namely, all purpose cleansers, cleaners for use on dishes, cleaners for use on fabric, and cleansers for use on floors, walls, windows and toilets; incense and room fragrances; and breath fresheners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named INTELLIGENT WATERS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |