Drawing for OHMEA

USPTO serial 78919289

OHMEA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 121

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OHMEA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eleanor M. Musick

Eleanor M. Musick Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP530 B Street, Suite 2100San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010medical devices for use in the treatment and therapy of various human conditions, namely sexual dysfunction, urinary incontinence, conditions relating to sexual dysfunction or urinary incontinence, and parts and accessories associated with the medical devices for the listed conditionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 28, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 24, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 29, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 29, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 29, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 11, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 11, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 23, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 23, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 8, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 8, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 29, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 19, 2007ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 17, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance