Drawing for BNY CONVERGEX GROUP

USPTO serial 78919716

BNY CONVERGEX GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PARK, JENNY K
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BNY CONVERGEX GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ILENE B. TANNEN, ESQ.

ILENE B TANNEN ESQ JONES DAY222 E 41ST STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036FINANCIAL, INVESTMENT AND SECURITIES SERVICES, NAMELY, FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT ANALYTICS AND ORDER MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES; FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, INVESTMENT SECURITIES TRANSACTION SERVICES VIA THE INTERNET, COMPUTER-TO-COMPUTER INTERFACE, AND BY CONNECTIONS TO THE PROPRIETARY NETWORKS OF OTHER SERVICE PROVIDERS; ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSACTIONS; ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER IN THE NATURE OF ELECTRONICALLY ROUTING ORDERS TO BUY, SELL, PLEDGE OR OTHERWISE AFFECT INTERESTS IN INVESTMENT SECURITIES; ELECTRONICALLY PROCESSING, RECORD KEEPING AND REPORTING OF PAYMENT DATA AND SOFT DOLLAR AND COMMISSION RECAPTURE IN CONNECTION WITH SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SECURITIES TRADING; INSTITUTIONAL AGENCY BROKERAGE SERVICES, NAMELY, INVESTMENT BROKERAGE AND SECURITIES BROKERAGE SERVICES INCLUDING SETTLEMENT AND CLEARING OF SECURITIES TRANSACTIONS; FINANCIAL RESEARCH, NAMELY, PROVIDING REPORTS AND COMMENTARY ON INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL RESEARCH CONCERNING FINANCIAL MARKETS, INDUSTRIES, SECTORS OR PUBLIC OR PRIVATE COMPANIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 23, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 25, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2006MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jul 6, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance