USPTO serial 78919793
DIRTY DIRTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIRTY DIRTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bernardo Protano, Esquire, P.A.
BERNARDO PROTANO, ESQ PA2500 HOLLYWOOD BLVD STE 411HOLLYWOOD, FL 33020-6615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Popular t-shirt with slogan | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 27, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |