USPTO serial 78920058
HAAM HEALTH ALLIANCE FOR AUSTIN MUSICIANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2007
- Examiner
- FLOWERS, JAY K
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with HAAM HEALTH ALLIANCE FOR AUSTIN MUSICIANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Health Alliance for Austin Musicians
Austin, TX
Other trademarks owned by Health Alliance for Austin Musicians
Health Alliance for Austin Musicians
Austin, TX
Other trademarks owned by Health Alliance for Austin Musicians
Health Alliance for Austin Musicians
Austin, TX
Other trademarks owned by Health Alliance for Austin Musicians
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raman N. Dewan
Raman N. Dewan JACKSON WALKER L.L.P.100 Congress Avenue, Suite 1100AUSTIN, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Administration of pre-paid primary health care, dental and mental health care plans for musicians | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Health Alliance for Austin Musicians
- Other trademarks owned by Health Alliance for Austin Musicians
- Other trademarks owned by Health Alliance for Austin Musicians
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named HAAM HEALTH ALLIANCE FOR AUSTIN MUSICIANS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 22, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 22, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 5, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 16, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |