USPTO serial 78920130
NEWLIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 2010
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with NEWLIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IRVINE, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Laguna Niguel, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Irvine, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason A. Gersting, Ph.D.
Jason A. Gersting, Ph.D. Snell & Wilmer LLP600 Anton Blvd., Suite 1400Costa Mesa, CA 92626United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Manufacturing materials in the nature of biotechnology used in the manufacturing and production of a wide variety of goods, namely, polymer base compositions used in the manufacturing and production of industrial and commercial goods, and unprocessed plastics in all forms | ACTIVE | Apr 16, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEWLIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Herrema-Kimmel, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Herrema-Kimmel, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NEWLIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NEWLIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named NEWLIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 23, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 23, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 17, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 9, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |