USPTO serial 78920213
HANNAH BEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HANNAH BEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail clothing stores featuring women's tops, bottoms and lingerie | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |