USPTO serial 78920701
HAVEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HAVEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T. Nabor
JOSEPH T NABOR FITCH, EVEN, TABIN & FLANNERY120 S LASALLE, STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603-3406UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Assisting localities and local entities in organizing and establishing groups of practicing and retired physicians, nurses, and other health professionals to act in a coordinated manner in times of local emergencies; Background investigation and research services; Bereavement Consulting; Body guard services; Civil protection; Computer security services in the nature of providing an internet trust center, namely, computer security assurance and administration of digital keys and digital certificates; Consulting services in the field of maintaining the security and integrity of databases; Control of building environmental access and security systems; Electronic monitoring services for security purposes in the field of civil defense; Guard services; Identification verification services, namely, providing authentication of personal identification information; Investigation or surveillance on background profiles; Ministerial services; Monitoring alarms; Monitoring of computer systems for security purposes; Monitoring security systems; Monitoring telephone calls from subscribers and notifying emergency facilities; On-line monitoring, namely, video monitoring of facilities, viewable through a global computer network; Organizational services for home or personal purposes, namely, personal safety; Personal security consultation; Police and civil protection services; Providing consultation and information in the field of emergency response for communities; Providing information in the field of the military, military tactics and strategies; Providing information regarding understanding and preventing terrorism; Security printing, namely, encoding identification information on valuable documents and products; Security services, namely, water vulnerability assessment services. Security inspections services for others; Tracking services for retrieval of encoded products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |