USPTO serial 78920728
CRYSTAL CREEK THE NATURAL CHOICE FOR AGRICULTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 12, 2008
- Examiner
- THOMAS, JANICE
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CRYSTAL CREEK THE NATURAL CHOICE FOR AGRICULTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Crystal Creek, a Division of Leiterman and Associates, Inc.
Trego, WI
Other trademarks owned by Crystal Creek, a Division of Leiterman and Associates, Inc.
Crystal Creek, a Division of Leiterman and Associates, Inc.
Trego, WI
Other trademarks owned by Crystal Creek, a Division of Leiterman and Associates, Inc.
Crystal Creek, a Division of Leiterman and Associates, Inc.
Trego, WI
Other trademarks owned by Crystal Creek, a Division of Leiterman and Associates, Inc.
LEITERMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Spooner, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony J. Bourget
ANTHONY J BOURGET BOURGET LAW, S.C.1119 Regis Court, Suite 110PO BOX 81EAU CLAIRE, WI 54702-0081Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ Topical health aids for livestock, namely, non-medicated salves ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 1998 |
| 005 | Nutritional supplements for all livestock, namely, cows, calves, swine, poultry, goats, sheep, horses, companion animals and exotic animals; topical health aids for livestock, namely, liniments and fly repellent | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 1998 |
| 044 | [ Consulting services relating to livestock nutrition, herd management and livestock health aids ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Crystal Creek, a Division of Leiterman and Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Crystal Creek, a Division of Leiterman and Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Crystal Creek, a Division of Leiterman and Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LEITERMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named CRYSTAL CREEK THE NATURAL CHOICE FOR AGRICULTURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 12, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |