USPTO serial 78921322
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plano, TX
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brooke R. Watson
Brooke R. Watson Troutman Pepper Locke LLP301 S College Street, 34th FloorCharlotte, NC 28202United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | educational services provided via global computer networks, namely, providing temporary use of nondownloadable educational software for use in accessing and managing educational course lists, educational units, educational lessons and exercises, information regarding field trips, educational lesson and/or unit-based tests and experiments, for use in providing students, teachers, and parents with online access to submit, receive, and review classroom assignments, course materials and class information, and for use in providing classroom management tools for teachers in the nature of course creation, student enrollment tracking, distribution of assignments, conducting of tests, and grading | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 22, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 5, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |