Drawing for THE LEGENDS OF BROADWAY

USPTO serial 78921391

THE LEGENDS OF BROADWAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE LEGENDS OF BROADWAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Major

Scott J. Major MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD.14TH FLOOR Atty Docket No. PARA-0019-TARLINGTON, VA 22201-3379

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded materials, namely, musical sound recordings, videotapes and digital video disks featuring musical performancesACTIVE—
016Paper and printed goods, namely, posters, souvenir concert programs containing pictures, photographs, biographical notes and news items and unmounted photographsACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, hats, caps, T-shirts, sweatshirts, bandanas and jacketsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, live music concerts and presentation of live show performances, periodic television specials in the fields of music and situational comedy and providing an entertainment website featuring prerecorded music, musical performances, musical videos, related film clips and entertainment information on musical concerts, shows and television specialsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 21, 2012EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2012EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 15, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2011EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2011EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 15, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 15, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 6, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 15, 2010EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 15, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 15, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2009ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Apr 15, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 11, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 5, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 5, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 5, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2009EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 27, 2009JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 27, 2009EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 26, 2009ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 26, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 10, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 30, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance