Drawing for PROTOOL MANUFACTURING

USPTO serial 78921463

PROTOOL MANUFACTURING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAKER, JORDAN A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROTOOL MANUFACTURING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randall K. McCarthy

RANDALL K MCCARTHY FELLERS, SNIDER ET AL100 N BROADWAY AVE STE 1700OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102-8820UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power tools, namely, power operated drill sharpeners, power operated grinders, power operated tool sharpeners, power operated knife sharpeners, power operated chisel sharpeners, power operated blade sharpeners, power operated end mill sharpeners, power operated tap sharpeners, power operated reamer sharpeners, and power operated sandersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 11, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 10, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 2, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 11, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 11, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 23, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 23, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 31, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 30, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 8, 2006MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jul 7, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance