USPTO serial 78921749
WHALEBONE VINEYARD OS DE BALEINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3329374Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 6, 2007
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHALEBONE VINEYARD OS DE BALEINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Adelaide, South Australia, AU
Adelaide, South Australia, AU
Adelaide, South Australia, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig A. Fieschko
CRAIG A FIESCHKO DEWITT ROSS & STEVENS SC8000 EXCELSIOR DR STE 400EXCELSIOR FINANCIAL CENTREMADISON, WI 53717-1914Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wines, distilled spirits, liqueurs | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tapanappa Wines Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Tapanappa Wines Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Tapanappa Wines Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named WHALEBONE VINEYARD OS DE BALEINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |