USPTO serial 78921777
ALL NATURAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANOR, THOMAS M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALL NATURAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen G. Janoski
STEPHEN G JANOSKI ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO & GOODMAN LLP1300 19TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-1649UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2006 | UNDR | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |