USPTO serial 78921791
JARDIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JARDIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Tally Eitan
A TALLY EITAN EITAN MEHULAL PAPPO KUGLERC/O EDNA EISEMANN18106 KITCHEN HOUSE CTGERMANTOWN, MD 20874Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Non-metal prefabricated storage sheds and storehouses, non-metal fence posts, gates and fencing, portable non-metal buildings; non-metal trellises; non-metal floor panels; roofing namely, plastic tiles; plastic water pipes; pre-fabricated non-metal architectural pillars and busts of stone and concrete for garden decoration | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household or kitchen utensils and containers, namely, spatulas, spoons for basting, mixing and serving, condiment holders, serving trays not of precious metal, cups, bowls, plates and vacuum flasks; articles for cleaning purposes, namely, pot cleaning brushes, buckets and squeegees; containers for household, kitchen and garden use, namely food storage containers, portable coolers, planters and holders for flowers and plants; garbage cans; bathroom accessories, namely, plastic bath racks, waste baskets, soap and shampoo holders and dispensers, plastic toothbrush holders, hair brushes, shaving brushes, hair combs; plastic storage baskets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |